DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE STUDY OF CONFESSIONAL HISTORY: THEORY AND PRACTICE

Tatyana V. Lisouskaya

doi:10.33581/79az1v72

Authors

Tatyana V. Lisouskaya Belarusian State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33581/79az1v72

Keywords:

discourse analysis, methodology of history, historical research, interdisciplinarity

Abstract

The author of the article presents the methodology of discourse analysis, studies the structural elements of discourse, and analyses the possibilities of using discourse analysis in confessional studies. It has been determined that discourse ana- lysis is a qualitative tool based on an interdisciplinary strategy that allows revealing the hidden meaning embedded in narra- tive sources and its manifestation in the process of implementing social relations. The article presents different approaches and methods of discourse analysis, which depend on the approach of the researcher, while noting that, within the frame- work of a specific historical study, discourse analysis always includes the main provisions of the critical discourse analysis methodology and it is aimed at studying the integral components of discourse: subject – activity – text – environment. As methodological principles of discourse analysis, the article highlights the problematisation and evaluation of discourse as a dialogic communicative act, involving the complex interaction of actors in a specific historical, political, socio-economic and cultural context, implemented in a specific narrative. Discourse analysis is built on an interdisciplinary strategy, which involves the use of theory, techniques and methods of various sciences (culturology, rhetoric, philosophy, psychology, poli- tical science, sociology, etc.) to identify the relationship between social, cultural, political and social processes, affecting the essence of discourse. Features of the practical application of discourse analysis in the study of confessional history are illustrated by the author on the example of the analysis of the discourse of state policy in relation to the Еvangelical movements of Western Belarus in 1921–1939. The main constituent elements of the discourse were subjected to discourse analysis using the methods of formal logic, the historical-genetic method, legal, sociological and other methods, which made it possible to draw conclusions about the external and internal factors of the state confessional policy, to determine its characteristic fea- tures and to reveal the latent meaning of the discourse of the state policy regarding the Еvangelical movements of Western Belarus. As a result of testing, the effectiveness of using discourse analysis for the comprehensive study of the subject of confessional history research was confirmed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kozhemyakin EA. [Discourse analysis as an interdisciplinary methodology: a historical aspect]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008;15:5–12. Russian.

2. Fuko M. Arheologiya znaniya [Archaeology of knowledge]. Rakova MB, Serebryannikova AYu, translators. Saint Peters- burg: Humanitarian Academy; 2004. 416 p. Russian.

3. Fairclough N. Methods of critical discourse analisys. London: Sage; 2013. 200 p.

4. Fairclough N. Language and power. London: Longman Group UK Limited; 1989. 259 p.

5. Reisigl M, Wodak R. The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Wodak R, Meyer M, editors. Methods for critical dis-

course analysis. London: Sage; 2009. p. 87–121.

6. Dubrovskaya TV. [Methods for studying the language of the legal sphere: speech-genre model]. In: Shumskaya D,

editor. Yazyk i metod. Russkii yazyk v lingvisticheskikh issledovaniyakh XXI veka [Language and method. Russian language in linguistic research of the 21st century]. Krakov: Publising House of Jagiellonian University; 2012. p. 55–68. Russian.

7. Wodak R, Meyer M, editors. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage; 2001. 200 p.

8. Ionova AO. Contemporary approaches to the analysis of political discourse. Political Science. 2016;3:236–259. Russian. 9. Datondji AC, Amousou F. Discourse-historical approach to critical discourse studies: theoretical and conceptual ana-

lysis, basic characteristics and analytical tools. Revue Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée, de Littérature et d’Education. 2019;2(1):70–80.

10. Hramtsova NG. Diskurs-pravovoi analiz: ot teorii k praktike primeneniya [Discourse-legal analysis: from theory to prac- tice of application]. Kurgan: Publising House of Kurgan State University; 2012. 180 p. Russian.

11. Grigor’eva VS. Diskurs kak element kommunikativnogo protsessa: pragmalingvisticheskii i kognitivnyi aspekty [Discourse as an element of the communicative process: pragmalinguistic and cognitive aspects]. Tambov: Publising House of Tambov State Technical University; 2007. 118 p. Russian.

12. Lisouskaya TV. Pozdnii protestantizm v Zapadnoi Belarusi (1921–1939 gg.) [Late Protestantism in Western Belarus (1921–1939)]. Brest: Al’ternativa; 2021. 190 p. Russian.

13. Zagіdulіn AM. Belaruskae pytanne w pol’skaj nacynal’naj i kanfesijnaj palitycy w Zahodnjaj Belarusi (1921–1939 gg.) [Belarusian question in the Polish national and confessional in Western Belarus (1921–1939)]. Hrodna: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2010. 166 p. Belarusian.

14. Lisouskaya TV. [The place and the role of Evangelical movements in the religious field of Western Belarus]. In: Bokun AI, editor. Evangel’skaja carkva Belarusi: gistoryja i suchasnasc’ (da 500-goddzja Brjesckaj Biblii) [Evangelical Church of Belarus: history and present (to the 500th anniversary of Brest Bible)]. Minsk: Pazityw-cjentr; 2021. p. 286–309. Belarusian.

15. Lisouskaya TV. [Inter-confessional communications: Protestantism in the poly-confessional society of Western Bela- rus in 1921–1939]. In: Bokun AI, editor. Evangel’skaja carkva Belarusi: gistoryja i suchasnasc’ (da 500-goddzja Brjesckaj Biblii) [Evangelical Church of Belarus: history and present (to the 500th anniversary of Brest Bible)]. Minsk: Pazityw-cjentr; 2021. p. 43–62. Belarusian.