Banyumasan–Javanese Local Wisdom in Project-Based Learning: Indicators Development and Validation for Entrepreneurship Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33581/istoriya.v7i3.97Keywords:
banyumasan-javanese value, local wisdom, project-based learning, entrepreneurship educationAbstract
This study develops and validates an instrument to integrate Banyumasan–Javanese local wisdom into project-based entrepreneurship learning (PJBL) in higher education. Using a mixed-methods, exploratory design, we first elicited value constructs through an in-depth interview and oral history with a culturally authoritative key informant (Ahmad Tohari), followed by a focus group discussion and expert triangulation to refine candidate indicators. Qualitative data were analyzed in MAXQDA via open–axial–selective coding, supported by a codebook, analytic memos, and member-checking, yielding 12 values (e.g., cablaka, guyub rukun, prewira, ajur ajer) mapped to PJBL outcomes (cognitive, affective, behavioral, artifact performance). To establish structural relevance and prioritize items, we applied Fuzzy-DEMATEL to expert judgments. All indicators exceeded the decision cut-off confirming demonstrated importance at the set level. Behavioral outcomes emerged as the most influential dimension, followed by affective and cognitive. The highest-prominence indicators were leadership, perseverance, harmonious but candid collaboration, self-reliance, openness, and adaptiveness as key levers for PJBL. Content validity was then examined with five experts using Aiken’s V, with all items meeting or exceeding accepted thresholds. The refined instrument was administered to entrepreneurship and business students. Reliability showed good internal consistency. Collectively, the qualitative grounding, Fuzzy-DEMATEL structural validation, content validity ratio (CVR), and student-based reliability evidence support a culturally grounded, psychometrically sound instrument. The results guide instructors to emphasize behavior-centric scaffolds and assessment while leveraging adaptive cognitive strategies and a supportive affective climate, thereby advancing contextualized, character-rich entrepreneurship education rooted in local wisdom.
Downloads
References
Abdulai, R. T., & Owusu-Ansah, A. (2014). Essential ingredients of a good research proposal for undergraduate and postgraduate students in the social sciences. SAGE Open, 4(3), 2158244014548178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014548178
Abdullah, M. A. (2021). Multidisiplin, interdisiplin, dan transdisiplin ilmu pengetahuan dan riset pada pendidikan tinggi masa depan. IB Pustaka.
Abou-Assali, M. (2014). The nature of educational inquiry: Is one approach better? International Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 3(2), 71–76.
Adebisi, Y. A. (2022). Undergraduate students’ involvement in research: Values, benefits, barriers and recommendations. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 81, 104384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104384
Afifi, R., & Yulisma, L. (2020). Implementasi model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dalam praktikum untuk meningkatkan intensi berwirausaha mahasiswa. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 12(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v12i1.2127
Afra, Y. A. (2024). Gender-based batik education in the group of women craftsmen at the Papringan Banyumas Batik Center [Thesis, Universitas Negeri Semarang]. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Africano, F. (2023). The role of entrepreneurial mental innovation and local wisdom on organizational resilience. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Management, 2(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijebm.v2i1.526
Aletras, N. (2021). Applied research in the production of a genre film: Production design and realization of a school movie. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(2), 75–83.
Alkiş Küçükaydin, M., & Gökbulut, Y. (2020). The impact of a research methods course on teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 18–33.
Alves, R. B., & Pinheiro, P. (2022). Factors influencing tacit knowledge sharing in research groups in higher education institutions. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030089
Anwar, L., Sa’dijah, C., Hidayah, I. R., & Abdullah, A. H. (2024). Integrating local wisdom and project-based learning to enhance critical thinking, collaboration, and creativity in mathematics education: A pilot study with eighth grade students in Malang. In AIP Conference Proceedings. (Details not provided)
Archibald, M. M. (2022). Interweaving arts-based, qualitative and mixed methods research: Showcasing integration and knowledge translation through material and narrative reflection. International Review of Qualitative Research, 15(2), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447221097063
Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Aryani, R. (2019). Entrepreneurship learning model based on local wisdom for increasing student creative business. Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Education, 1(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijoce.v1i1.7
Beddoes, K., & Borrego, M. (2014). Facilitating formation of shared mental models in interdisciplinary graduate student teams. International Journal of Collaborative Engineering, 1(4), 236–255.
Brewer, T. M. (1998). Arts education advocacy and research: To what end? Arts Education Policy Review, 99(5), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632919809599476
Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045221
Cahyaningsih, E., Suprijati, H., & Azy, L. (2025). Integrating local cultural wisdom in project-based learning to improve science education: A study of Kudus. Education and Sociedad Journal, 2(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.61987/edsojou.v2i2.701
Carpenter, A., & Wilson, R. (2022). A systematic review looking at the effect of entrepreneurship education on higher education student. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100541
Chen, G., & Chen, J. (2025). A study of postgraduate students’ research training environment and innovation capabilities: The mediating role of academic interest and aspiration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2325005
Cibangu, S. K. (2010). Paradigms, methodologies, and methods. Library & Information Science Research, 32(3), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.03.006
Colbert, F., & St-James, Y. (2014). Research in arts marketing: Evolution and future directions. Psychology & Marketing, 31(8), 566–575.
Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153
Condee, W. (2016). The interdisciplinary turn in the arts and humanities. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 34, 12–29.
Corbacho, A. M., Minini, L., Pereyra, M., et al. (2021). Interdisciplinary higher education with a focus on academic motivation and teamwork diversity. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100062
Davidavičienė, V. (2018). Research methodology: An introduction. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the academic teaching and research environment: Methodologies and cases in business research (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_1
de Klerk, W., Barnard, M., de Klerk, E., du Toit, R., & Daniel-Smit, J. (2023). The social science research process: A new model. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 156–173.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1997). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Diana, N., & Sukma, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Djahwasi, H. R., & Saidon, Z. L. (2020). Artistic research: Artistic as research vs artistic as method. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(11), 292–309.
Dodgson, J. E. (2021). Critical analysis: The often-missing step in conducting literature review research. Journal of Human Lactation, 37(1), 27–32.
Doğantan-Dack, M. (2020). Why collaborate? Critical reflections on collaboration in artistic research in classical music performance. In M. Blain & H. J. Minors (Eds.), Artistic research in performance through collaboration (pp. 39–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38599-6_3
El-Abiad, Z., & El-Chaarani, H. (2023). How to write your PhD thesis: The easy handbook. Journal of Contemporary Research in Business Administration and Economic Sciences (JCR-BAES).
European Commission. (2013). Entrepreneurship education: A guide for educators.
Farhaeni, M., & Martini, S. (2024). Bahasa dalam membentuk interaksi sosial dan identitas budaya. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 4(1), 54–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v4i1.3786
Febi Arifianto, P., Setiawan, B., & Masnuna, M. (2024). Strengthening culture and creative economy development in support of digital economy development. International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Arts Creation and Studies, 9(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.33153/iicacs.v9i1.224
Fitri, A., Nafis, M., & Indarti, L. (2020). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary (MIT) learning approach and strategy based on Indonesian National Qualification Framework (KKNI) curriculum. Ulumuna, 24(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v24i1.375
Freedman, K. (2005). Art education: Epistemologies of art. Studies in Art Education, 46(2), 99–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2005.11651783
Gamage, A. N. K. K. (2025). Research design, philosophy, and quantitative approaches in scientific research methodology. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 13(2), 91–103.
Gardiner, P. (2020). Learning to think together: Creativity, interdisciplinary collaboration and epistemic control. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100749
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gong, K. (2022). Open science: The science paradigm of the new era. Cultures of Science, 5(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083221091867
Griffiths, M. (2011). Research and the self. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to research in the arts. Routledge.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Harefa, D. (2024). Strengthening mathematics and natural sciences education based on the local wisdom of South Nias: Integration of traditional concepts in modern education. HAGA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.57094/haga.v3i2.2347
Hart-Baldridge, E. (2020). Faculty advisor perspectives of academic advising. NACADA Journal, 40(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-18-25
Haskell, C. D. (2017). Institutional research as a bridge. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 11(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-08-2017-001
Howells, J. (1996). Tacit knowledge. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 91–106.
Ibáñez, A. M. (2018). Visual research methodologies in the field of art education: Conceptual analysis and specific theoretical framework of reference. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(1), 75–93.
Irawan, M. F., Zulhijrah, Z., & Prastowo, A. (2023). Perencanaan pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan alam berbasis project based learning pada Kurikulum Merdeka di sekolah dasar. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(3), 38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v12i3.20716
Jardim, J., Bártolo, A., & Pinho, A. (2021). Towards a global entrepreneurial culture: A systematic review of the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programs. Education Sciences, 11(8), Article 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080398
Jatmika, B. J., & Amalia, K. (2024). Epistemologi pendidikan: Elaborasi pengetahuan untuk mencapai keautentisitasan kecerdasan manusia. NUSRA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(2), 561–573.
Jennings, W. G. (2021). Presidential address: Widening the net of education, research and scholarship, and service and community engagement in criminology and criminal justice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(4), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09628-7
Kamlongera, M. I. (2021). “So what’s arts got to do with it?” An autoethnography of navigating researcher positionality while co-creating knowledge. Qualitative Research, 23(3), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211045611
Klaassen, R. G. (2018). Interdisciplinary education: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 842–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1442417
Kluger, M. O., & Bartzke, G. (2020). A practical guideline how to tackle interdisciplinarity—A synthesis from a post-graduate group project. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00540-9
Kraehe, A. M., & Acuff, J. B. (2013). Theoretical considerations for art education research with and about “underserved populations”. Studies in Art Education, 54(4), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2013.11518904
Livingston, S. A., Carlson, J., & Bridgeman, B. (2018). Test reliability—Basic concepts (Research Memorandum No. RM-18-01). Educational Testing Service.
Luqmi, F. Z., Abas, E., Istiana, I., & Karmila, K. (2025). Integrating local wisdom and modern technology to address Society 5.0 era challenges in culture. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 4(1), 1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v4i1.6226
Magara, E., Copriady, J., & Linda, R. (2021). Validity of assessment instruments for students’ creative thinking ability on hydrocarbon material. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.264
Mäkinen, E. I., Evans, E. D., & McFarland, D. A. (2020). The patterning of collaborative behavior and knowledge culminations in interdisciplinary research centers. Minerva, 58(1), 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09381-6
Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922
Mason, R. (2008). Problems of interdisciplinarity: Evidence-based and/or artist-led research? International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00586.x
McHoul, A., & Luke, A. (1989). The discourses and politics of “education” and “epistemology”. Social Epistemology, 3(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728908578510
Mislay, M. A., & Anania, A. M. (2025). Determinants of postgraduate students’ awareness and utilization of educational research paradigms and approaches in a public university in Tanzania. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101197
Morris, J. E., & Paris, L. F. (2022). Rethinking arts-based research methods in education: Enhanced participant engagement processes to increase research credibility and knowledge translation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 45(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1926971
Morss, R. E., Lazrus, H., & Demuth, J. L. (2021). The “inter” within interdisciplinary research: Strategies for building integration across fields. Risk Analysis, 41(7), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13246
Muchlas, Z. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran kewirausahaan terhadap motivasi kewirausahaan. Relasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, 17(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.31967/relasi.v17i1.409
Mulej, L., & Sirca, N. T. (2010). Culture and wisdom: Tacit knowledge as a way of learning in higher education. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 7(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2010.031951
Munir, S., Merlinda, S., Soesilo, Y. H., & Windrayadi, Y. D. P. (2021). Experience-based learning models in entrepreneurship courses: An innovation to promote entrepreneurship based on local wisdom. KnE Social Sciences, 5(8), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i8.9386
Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2012). Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 40(2), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2012.6210519
Ningrum, E. (2016). [Conference paper]. In Proceedings of the 1st UPI International Conference on Sociology Education. https://doi.org/10.2991/icse-15.2016.88
Nurpratiwiningsih, L., Rusdarti, R., Widodo, J., & Sanjoto, T. B. (2023). Local wisdom as learning innovation in elementary schools. In International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, Indonesia.
Oni, O., Agbobli, E. K., & Iwu, C. G. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance of small business in Vryburg region, North West province, South Africa. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 63–71.
Overton, W. F. (2012). Evolving scientific paradigms: Retrospective and prospective. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Paradigms in theory construction (pp. 31–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_3
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors (1st ed.). Routledge.
Parsons, M. J. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 39(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320463
Pepperell, R. (2015). Artworks as dichotomous objects: Implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 1–17.
Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428.
Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022002023
Prior, R. W. (2018). Using art as research in learning and teaching: Multidisciplinary approaches across the arts. Intellect.
Prior, R. W. (2019). Artistic significance, creativity, and innovation using art as research. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_64-1
Priyadi, S., Karton, K., & Widayati, N. (2015). Guru mendongeng kearifan lokal Banyumasan. Khazanah Pendidikan, 9(1).
Puspitasari, F. F., & Priatmoko, S. (2022). Development of integrated entrepreneurship education based on local wisdom through Jagong Maton. Nidhomul Haq: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 690–703. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i3.1757
Putri, M. F. J. L., Septipane, D., Sulistiawati, D., & Mumung, K. E. (2023). Peranan masyarakat dalam mengembangkan nilai kearifan lokal di suku Baduy. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 1811–1816. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i2.5466
Rafiu, S. (2021). Bonokeling dulu kini dan nanti (Mintarti, Ed.). SIP Publishing.
Rasdia, R., & Hernah, H. (2024). Strategy for instilling local wisdom values in the formation of students’ morals. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII), 5(3), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v5i3.1138
Retnowati, R., Istiadi, Y., & Istiana, R. (2019). Effectiveness of project learning model based on local wisdom in improving creativity to develop environment learning media. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018).
Rofiqoh, I., & Zulhawati. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sari, N. (2020). Pendidikan berbasis kearifan lokal untuk membentuk karakter siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran: JPPP, 1(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v1i1.4452
Siswadhi, F., Carolina, C., & Marselina, S. (2020). Optimalisasi peran pemuda dalam pembangunan ekonomi kreatif berbasis sektor pariwisata. Jurnal Ekonomi Sakti (JES), 9(1), 170–187.
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3604_2
Susilorini, R. M. R. (2022). Kearifan lokal Jawa Tengah: Tak lekang oleh waktu. SCU Knowledge Media.
Suttrisno, S., & Rofi’ah, F. Z. (2023). Integrasi nilai-nilai kearifan lokal guna mengoptimalkan Projek Penguatan Pelajar Pancasila Madrasah Ibtidaiyah di Bojonegoro. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 53–76.
Tilaar, H. (2015). Pedagogik teoretis untuk Indonesia. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Uge, S., Neolaka, A., & Yasin, M. (2019). Development of social studies learning model based on local wisdom in improving students’ knowledge and social attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12323a
Watthanakuljaroen, T. (2023). Development of a model for knowledge management of local wisdom via virtual learning community for instructional management. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1720–1728. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1981
Wray, K. B. (2010). Kuhn and the discovery of paradigms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109359778
Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhurnal Belorusskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Istoriya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
