Ancient Greek Conceptions of “Laws of Nature”: A Reassessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33581/istoriya.v7i3.102Keywords:
laws of nature, ancient Greek philosophy, Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoreanism, Middle Platonism, Nicomachus, GalenAbstract
This study challenges the long-standing claim that ancient Greek thinkers lacked a conception equivalent to “laws of nature.” By closely examining selected passages from Plato, Aristotle, Philo of Alexandria, Nicomachus of Gerasa, and Galen, the paper demonstrates that several Greek authors not only articulated such ideas but explicitly employed terminology corresponding to “laws of nature.” These occurrences appear within two major intellectual lineages: the Platonic tradition and the diverse currents of ancient Pythagoreanism. Texts featuring arithmetical doctrines, numerical cosmology, or medical explanations contain explicit references to laws of nature, revealing that Greek authors occasionally framed natural regularities in rule-like or law-like terms. Particularly significant are Nicomachus’ formulations, which ascribe mathematical, universal, and necessary characteristics to these laws features typically sought in modern histories tracing the emergence of the scientific concept of natural law. The analysis raises the possibility that these Greek formulations may have contributed, directly or indirectly, to medieval and early modern developments, including those influencing figures such as Kepler and Newton. Overall, the findings overturn the prevailing narrative by showing that the concept of “laws of nature” was not absent from Greek antiquity but emerged within philosophical contexts rooted in Platonic and Pythagorean thought.
Downloads
References
Aristotle. (1995). On the heavens (J. L. Stocks, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press.
Aristotle. Nicomachean ethics. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Aristotle. Politics. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Aristotle. Sophistic refutations. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Baltussen, H. (2007). Playing the Pythagorean: Ion’s triagmos. In V. Jennings & A. Katsaros (Eds.), The world of Ion of Chios (pp. 295–318). Brill.
Barnes, J. (2002). Galen, Christians, logic. In T. P. Wiseman (Ed.), Classics in progress: Essays on ancient Greece and Rome (pp. 399–417). Oxford University Press.
Brain, P. (1986). Galen on bloodletting: A study of the origins, development and validity of his opinions, with a translation of the three works. Cambridge University Press.
Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and science in ancient Pythagoreanism. Harvard University Press.
Cornelli, G., McKirahan, R., & Macris, C. (Eds.). (2013). On Pythagoreanism. De Gruyter.
Dillon, J. (1996). The Middle Platonists. Duckworth.
Feke, J. (2018). Ptolemy’s philosophy: Mathematics as a way of life. Princeton University Press.
Galen. (1986). On venesection against Erasistratus (P. Brain, Trans.). In P. Brain, Galen on bloodletting. Cambridge University Press.
Galen. On the causes of symptoms.
Galen. Difficulties in breathing.
Galen. On the use of the pulses
Galen. On my own books
Galen. On my own opinions
Galen. Commentary on Hippocrates’ Aphorisms
Galen. On the use of the parts (Helmreich ed.).
Gerson, L. P. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge history of philosophy in late antiquity (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1969). A history of Greek philosophy: Vol. 3. The fifth-century enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.
Heinimann, F. (1945). Nomos und Physis. Reinhardt.
Horky, P. (2013). Plato and Pythagoreanism. In G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, & C. Macris (Eds.), On Pythagoreanism (pp. 193–194). De Gruyter.
Jouanna, J. (2003). La notion de nature chez Galien. In J. Barnes & J. Jouanna (Eds.), Galen et la philosophie (pp. 229–262). Fondation Hardt.
Kenny, A. (2004). The rise of modern philosophy. Clarendon Press.
Kerferd, G. (1981). The sophistic movement. Cambridge University Press.
Kovačić, F. (2001). Der Begriff der Physis bei Galen vor dem Hintergrund seiner Vorgänger. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Lehoux, D. (2020). Saved by the phenomena: Law and nature in Cicero and the (Pseudo?) Platonic Epinomis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 81, 55–61.
Lehoux, D. (2012). What did the Romans know?. University of Chicago Press.
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1971). Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought (Original work published 1966). Cambridge University Press.
Milton, J. R. (1987). The origin and development of the concept of laws of nature. In J. R. Milton (Ed.), The metaphysics of natural law (pp. 174–175). Clarendon Press.
Milton, J. R. (1990). Laws of nature. In The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Nutton, V. (2004). Ancient medicine. Routledge.
Ott, W., & Patton, L. (2018). Laws of nature and powers. Oxford University Press.
Philo of Alexandria. (2010). Complete works (Trans. various). Harvard University Press.
Plato. (1997). Timaeus. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Plato. (1997). Parmenides (M. L. Gill & P. Ryan, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Plato. (1997). Laws. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Complete works. Hackett Publishing.
Plutarch. Fragmenta and Quaestiones convivales (Chrysippus quotation).
Pseudo-Plato. Epinomis. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete Works. Hackett Publishing.
Turner, J. (2019). Early modern mathematical laws and their ancient antecedents. Journal of the History of Ideas, 80(3), 345–372.
Walzer, R. (1949). Galen on Jews and Christians. Oxford University Press.
Wilson, C. (2008). From limits to laws: The construction of the nomological image of nature in early modern philosophy. In L. Daston & M. Stolleis (Eds.), Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe (pp. 13–28). Ashgate. (Reprinted Routledge, 2016.)
Zhmud, L. (2013). Pythagorean number doctrine in the Academy. In G. Cornelli, R. McKirahan, & C. Macris (Eds.), On Pythagoreanism (pp. 323–344). De Gruyter.
Zhmud, L. (2021). The Anonymus Arithmologicus and its philosophical background. In C. Macris, T. Dorandi, & L. Brisson (Eds.), Pythagoras redivivus (pp. 341–379). Academia Verlag.
Zilsel, E. (1942). The genesis of the concept of physical law. The Philosophical Review, 51(3), 245–279.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zhurnal Belorusskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Istoriya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.















